EVA WAS EERST spaceship moon - origin of the moon - impact theory

 

 

SPACESHIP MOON

 

 

First: This chapter is a long one, you could see it as an apart entity. We claim that our moon is in fact a displaced planet. That must be a crazy view to many, but after all that view is not important to support our main opinion: extra terrestrial beings visited Earth in the past.

 

Note that if so many believe that Jesus ascended to heaven you don't have to be ashamed if you too -just like we do- believe our moon could be a displaced planet. Don’t believe too fast that something is impossible. And above all: Think for yourself.

 

 

Theories about the origin of the moon

 

 

Until the late seventies the 'fission theory' was commonly accepted as an explanation for the origin of the moon: ‘When Earth was still a spinning sphere of lava, a part broke loose and became our moon. ' The theory was full of flaws, so there came another explanation: ‘The moon was once a planet that due to natural circumstances came too close and was captured by the gravity of Earth.' A theory that showed as many flaws as the first one.

 

Unlike other moons in our solar system, where there is sometimes more than one acceptable explanation for their existence, every theory about the origin of our moon seems fundamentally impossible. The main reason? Earth is simply too small to 'capture' or 'reject and hold' such a large moon in an almost circular orbit.

 

 

A summary of other theories.

 

 

In 1976 the impact theory emerged. It took a long time, but now this theory is seen as the official explanation.

 

According to the impact theory the moon arose from a collision of an immense celestial body (called Theia) with Earth.

 

(Theia stands for the mother of the Greek moon goddess Selene. Again a reference associated with Isis -mysterious hints to Isis are everywhere-.)

 

NASA seems to ignore all obstacles of the impact theory.

 

However the obstacles are huge.

 

One of the stumbling blocks? The ratios of oxygen isotopes of Earth- and moonstones are identical, while it’s clear now that an impact would have mixed everything in a disproportionate manner.

 

Other elementary stumbling blocks:

-Earth never had a magma ocean, however a necessity for the impact model;

-iron oxide content of the moon (13%) is exactly between that of mars (18%) and Earth (8%), while it should have a bias toward Earth’s content of iron;

-other ratios Earth/moon, including those of rubidium/cesium, contradict the impact model;

-an impact provides an abundance of heavy elements sinking in the soil. The moon doesn’t has that feature;

- ...

 

So the oxygen ratios are only one of the obstacles, but it’s one that NASA could counter. So they focus on it.

 

According to Dr. Robin Canup (Southwest Research Institute, Colorado) who is involved in a number of NASA projects, the (almost) identical ratios are explained as follows: The 'impactor' (Theia) was simultaneously formed with Earth and followed an orbit for hundreds of millions of years between Venus and Mars. Than a collision occurred 'Because otherwise the planet could never have become our moon.'

 

What an extraordinary explanation and that, in order to eliminate only one obstacle. (We think our explanation really is less farfetched.)

 

Is there something wrong?

 

Hard to say, but recent studies revealed something else. Namely that 'official' moonstones’ resemble earth's stones a little too much. Something that emerges from next clip. (The clip is but one of many. On You Tube one can follow the entire series.)

 

You can also skip the clip. (We regret that you will have no other choice because we discovered on 23 December 2013 that the fragment has disappeared from YouTube.) You can believe us: Summarized in a few words it said that besides the oxygen isotopes there are much more ratios identical.

 

Some say they try to confuse us deliberately: ‘Some researchers who asked for moonstones, got ordinary stones from planet Earth.'

 

 

 

 

2014-01-08: Youtube if you were not an eye opener to us sometimes, we would not love you so much! Because fragments seem to come and go. We save ourselves the trouble to change our text again. You readers, for sure, will understand.

 

 

A surprising moonrock story

 

 

In the past, Americans gave many (alleged) moon rocks as a present to friendly countries. The Dutch State Museum got one in 1969. The Dutch assured the stone for $ 60,000, rising to $ 500,000 systematically with the years passing. In 2009 it became clear that the stone was a product of planet Earth (value negligible). A lot of money wasted, a massive reputation dent and countless visitors cheated for forty years, but the Dutch didn’t needed excuses, they stated: ’It was funny.‘

 

We see nothing funny about this.

 

We only notice that our real rulers are anxiously watching moon stones. (Leaked undercover operations speak for themselves.)

 

And from time to time they (order to) launch new theories about our moon.

 

On August 4, 2011 we read: 'Earth first had two moons.'

 

To make a long story short: the discussions about the origin of the moon are endless. And the real rulers like to keep it that way.

 

 

 

Riddles about the origin of the moon

 

 

We know extremely little about our moon. If we are to believe official sources, one has only scratched the moon surface (so to speak).

 

That we think there are traces of extraterrestrial visit on the moon, should be clear after reading this website. But there's a lot more: and we have the impression that scientists are not allowed to do everything to solve the mysteries.

 

-There is no credible explanation for the moons origin, so close to planet Earth;

-How did our small planet could force such a gigantic moon (proportionally) to an almost circular orbit? In fact, a pronounced elliptical orbit would already be doubtful;

 

Just to give you an idea. There are -let's say- 178 moons in our solar system. Ganymede (moon of Jupiter) is the biggest one. She has a diameter of 5268 km. Our moon 3476 km. Jupiter has a diameter of 142.984 km, Earth 12.756 km. The biggest moons measure less than 5 percent of the diameter of their planet. Our moon nearly 30 percent.

-Why the moon's orbit deviates so much from the equatorial plane of Earth?

-Why does Venus has no moon?

-The moon is exactly at the right distance to cover the sun completely. What is called an unlikely coincidence;

-Why she has so many mascons (craters with concentrated gravity)? (Some claim that a number of those mascons have artificial characteristics.)

-The moon always stands with the same side to Earth, this is called: 'tidally locked'. There are many questions about that phenomenon. Other moons in our solar system are also tidally locked, but their home planets are gigantic and have so much more 'power'. Anyway, this point is in fact superfluous because if Earth could not have been capable of 'holding' its moon, tidally locking it is out of question;

-If the moon for hundreds of millions of years slowed down earth's rotation, why Earth still rotates around its axis so fast?

 

In addition there are the questions that were raised previously on this site and are only indirectly related with this specific chapter:

 

Why tunnels and underground spaces on the moon get so little attention? Why are there no computer-controlled moon robots (by analogy with the mars robots) to map the moon? Why superpowers -let’s say it like it is- seem to be afraid to put foot on the moon? Why NASA is so reluctant about Tower and Shard? And why Tower and Shard seem to point right to us? Why photos have to be censored anyway? Where is the long promised moon base? ...

 

(Pluto and its moon Charon are so far away that any comparison is excluded. They are the only ones whose proportionality relative to each other outdo that of Earth and its moon. But they are circling around each other, both with the same side directed towards each other, as a 'double-dwarf planet'.)

 

In the 19th century astronomers and geologists believed that practically all meteorites ever reached planet Earth came from the moon. Volcanoes on the moon were responsible. At least, that was what scholars thought. Later it became clear the moon has no active volcanoes for a billion of years. Nevertheless it was sure that moon rocks on Earth, especially in desert areas, must have been numerous. Hundreds of millions of years of meteors and comets hitting the lunar surface, had scattered space with stones. And the Earth’s gravity, combined with the short distance moon/Earth, had ensured a steady rain of meteorites on Earth. At least, that was what scholars of a slightly younger generation thought.

 

NASA knows very well the difference between real and fake moon rocks. So let us assume that about the number of moonstones on Earth they are sincere. At the end of 2010 there were 134 moon rocks (about 50 kilograms).

 

Why have hundreds of millions of years of impacts on the moon yielded such a small number of moon rocks on Earth?

 

(If the moon is what we think she is, than it's no coincidence that the number of moon rocks is roughly equivalent to the number of mars rocks found on Earth.)

 

 

A summary of lunar anomalies (Note: a reference does not necessarily mean that we agree with everything.) Greek and Roman authors speak about people that lived before there was a moon in the sky. Furthermore, in Tiahuanaco (Tiwanaku, Bolivia) they found characters telling us about the arrival of the moon (approximately 12.600 years ago). Problem is that nobody seems to claim the translation of the characters.

 

 

Life on Earth does NOT need the moon

 

 

Does life on Earth really needs the moon?

 

In each presentation we hear that the moon is essential for life on Earth. Therefore she always must have been there. Here too, however, we must speak of an enigma. Because, why are there so many blind followers of that idea? After some research, it’s clear that the simple models are not quite that simple.

 

Without the moon tides will be smaller and it will be usually much darker at night. If the moon would suddenly disappear, Earth's rotation would sputter and/or Earth’s axis would maybe get a knock. Result could be climate change and many disasters. But life would continue, probably after a setback. There would be seasons and Earth's axis would still wobble. In fact: All planets in our solar system wobble. It has something to do with gravitational forces that are working in on each other. But nobody exactly seems to know how it all works. Special astronomers dare (somewhat) row against the tide.

 

The conclusion we make from various 'guesses': The value of the moon for life on Earth is grossly overrated. And she could have some influence on preccession ... but that's not sure, there is namely some controverse about that.

 

 

The moon once was a planet that followed its own orbit around the sun

 

 

The moon is so close and yet she is one big mystery. So big that some began to think 'outside the box '.

 

Nobody can explain how it is possible that the location of the moon can be where it is now. That should be clear. Nobody knows how she is formed. To us that's a fact too. If we follow the alien hypothesis our moon even could have been formed after an impact with Mars. Unlike Earth, Mars has an obvious gigantic magma ocean, something that points to a giant impact. And the iron oxide content of the moon's regolith resembles that of Mars' regolith. All in all it seems that our moon looks more to be coming from Mars than from Earth. But to be clear: in this context that doesn't matter.

 

Can our moon ever have been replaced?

 

Admittedly, this is a risky question. (There are more to come.)

 

Should our geniuses today be able to replace the moon? Who knows for sure?

 

She has remarkably little mass. Something that made us think she may have been deliberately hollowed out. It could explain the vibrations after some Apollo landings. As if the moon was ringing like a bell. Besides, there may have been more than one reason why our visitors could have hollowed out the moon, but we won't get into that.

 

Moreover, Tower and Shard could hide a technology that, utilizing the many mascons, can influence gravity. (Or does the Tower has a destination that pushes even more the imagination and is he -as many believe- a kind of signpost for the soul?) Anyway: at the current pace of technological growth, in about two hundred years -a negligible period- we can’t exclude anything. Not even the signpost destination.

 

The idea that our alien visitors with anti-gravity and other superior technology, moved a small planet (the moon) is after all not so crazy. As with so many things that are being reinvented, we are not surprised that some people today already ‘invented’ a way to move a planet. A surreal dream according to many, but we cannot deny that some scholars are making theories about it. Apparently Nicola Tesla thought he could use planet Earth as a space ship. (See 3th paragraph of the article.)

Anyway there are lots of studies about how to move a planet.

We suspect Tesla knew about secret knowledge so his idea could have come -like so many other ideas- from our creators.

 

In addition to anti-gravity there is also a far less controversial way (we know about). The asteroids method. Earth or moon-grazing asteroids could take the Earth or moon in tow (so to speak). So one must be a little stubborn to say that the possibility of displacing our moon is technically impossible. As a remark we like to add that the moons of Mars (see below) happen to have been good candidates to move the moon. Those so-called moons even may have served multiple purposes ... like the mining or space station probability. Little sophisticated space stations built into gigantic asteroids could be the best solution to precisely drive celestial rocks. By the way, the grooves on Phobos, for one reason or another, could have been made by our creators. One enigma solved?

 

If a displacement of a small planet by extraterrestrials once took place, it could solve all mysteries about our moon.

 

Why the near side of the moon consists of about 31 percent of ‘seas’ while the far side merely consists of one percent seas? Besides, the last one has much more craters.

 

That Earth is protecting the near site against comet impacts is not a valid explanation. Researchers now think that the 'heat-producing elements' of the near side have created the seas, or that the 'two-moons-theory' can help explain. At the same time they admit they are facing an enigma.

 

If our moon once was our natural neighbor between Earth and Mars, it would explain everything. Mercury and Venus rotate but very slow around their axis. In an orbit between Earth and Mars our lighter moon would possibly always have faced the sun with the same side. Result: many craters on the far side and a fairly intact, solidified looking, near side.

 

 

Just a remark: Venus’ temperature is about 500 degrees Celsius. Comets make more shallow craters on Venus because the melting surroundings have time to fill the crater more or less. The same thing could have happened on the moon. Venus has a thick atmosphere that slows down a lot of comets and asteroids, but the heat itself of Venus plays also a big role in the shallowness of the craters. By the way, if once our moon was a separate planet with one side directed to the sun, the temperature could have been much higher than 500 degrees, for sure in the early days of the planet. So the scorched side would not be a surprise. Added to that: the sun would have probably intercepted a lot of comets and asteroids. Doing so she protected one side of the moon much more than the other site of getting hit by comets or asteroids.

 

One of many sites that clearly demonstrate the relationship between hot temperatures and shallowness of craters.

 

 

The winged messenger of the gods

 

 

Mercury was the 'winged messenger of the gods' in Greek mythology. As you will remark further, that name fits better with our moon. And although the name was given by the Romans, supposedly because of the speed at which the planet revolves around the sun, we know that already before Plato there were people with secret knowledge. Meanwhile, we know that the real rulers always have liked to play (name) games. But they are prudent for millennia. We also remain prudent. But the striking resemblance made us think that maybe they once thought to name our moon 'Mercury'. Only they concluded: ‘Better not’.

 

Was Mercury once the moon of Venus? We think so. Just like our moon originally was the moon of Earth (or Mars) but with a very eccentric orbit, later escaped (just like Venus' moon) and just recently was brought to planet Earth by our creators. Only, she has been put in a very special place, a place she never could have reached without help from above.

 

 

 

Left: mercury (diameter: 4880 km), right: the moon (3476 km diameter). They resemble extremely well. (Photo: Wikipedia)

***

An anecdote in between

 

 

In 2009 an article appeared in an internet newspaper that referred to statements of great scholars: 'If aliens ever arrive here, it will be on a planet. In order to avoid destabilisation of our solar system they would have to leave their planet somewhere between Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud. Instead of their planet they would have to place a giant spacecraft in an orbit between Earth and Mars. So they easily could visit Earth with more conventional spaceships.'

 

By the way, great scholars took for granted that a planet inhabited by aliens could come from everywhere -even from outside our solar system-.

 

(In 2013 Scholz's star system was discovered and we have to admit we didn't even had a clue something like this was possible. But in the mean time it has been proven that those scholars were probably very close to the truth.)

 

Responses to the article were welcome.

 

We were eager to give our opinion. Our response: '12.600 years ago a dwarf planet was taken out of its natural orbit around the sun between Earth and Mars and became our moon. All the work was done by extraterrestrial visitors. Before that our moon followed its own orbit around the sun and served as the gigantic spacecraft between Earth and Mars.'

 

We didn’t mention our opinion about how logic it is that aliens never would land (to stay) on Earth because of so many problems (gravity, atmosphere, viruses, etcetera ). During the time she followed her own orbit, she could have been the laboratory of our creators, the place where they transplanted their soul in an earthly female body to make it possible for them to survive on Earth.

 

So, all in all we tempered ourselves.

 

What turned out? Our reaction was banned, while comments like 'I send my mother-in-law to go and see’ were published by many.

 

Tried three times to get our reaction published, without result, and without explanation from the moderator. Apparently moderators of internet newspapers see us as idiots (we hope we are normal citizens). In short, we don’t like moderators anymore, but they have led us to the point that our unpublished response has grown to the size of an internet book. Or how a small incident can be a reason to start writing. Albeit we try to stay modest because we experienced that writing is a job too hard for us.

 

It must been said we had no scientific basis that could support our vision. Until we stumbled on a brief communication from the Harvard University proving that astronomers (there are indeed multiple) are thinking there is a planet missing between Earth and Mars. Just one of the many weird findings that we think is related to our moon's history. We know many articles about a missing planet between Mars and Jupiter, but about the chances of a missing planet beween Earth and Mars you almost never read a word ...

 

About Dimitris Christodoulou, his publication list and curriculum vitae.

***

December 2011: a You Tube clip hits the news: 'a spaceship as big as our moon is hiding behind mercury.‘ Three million viewers in a few days. Finally one will see the fault in the NASA photo. Yet discussions reveal that scientists think that spaceships as big as our moon could exist. And that people all over the world are very interested in the alien issue. This could be an extra indication that the moon is also more popular than they let us believe.

***

(You already noticed: in fact 'spaceship moon' is not the best title for this chapter. Our moon is rather a ‘caravan moon', a 'lifeboat moon’, a 'protector moon' or a 'guardian moon', but we choose 'spaceship moon' because it sounds better.)

 

 

Big question: Where is the moon in ancient paintings?

 

 

Before the mega disasters (until thousands of years later) the moon was never depicted.

 

A fascinating and mysterious celestial body that changes shape and is childishly simple to be painted, is nowhere to be seen in any picture older than say 8000 years.

 

Why the first cave painters apparently ruminated about animals is indeed a mystery. But they made countless drawings not limited to animals, in places far outside Europe. Only, they never painted the moon. Strange they painted stars and star clusters. Stars were dots in their paintings (that is logical). The Sun was a (concentric) circle. Also fairly logical. But where is the crescent moon?

 

Thanks to the moon humans could hunt at night, they could travel or flee ... The moon must have been a 'God Gift' to them. But still they didn't picture her. Come on.

 

Our ancestors had a keen interest in the night sky. And they thought symbolic. The chances are large –húge- that they had painted the moon as a half moon ... if that half moon would have been there.

 

Some claim that so-called lunar calendars have been recovered, which show the lunar cycle. But if one observed the moon that closely, then it becomes completely incomprehensible why no one ever painted a crescent moon.

 

Many scientists state that 30.000 years ago some ancients were real astronomers. A statement that makes sense. Someone who creates great works of art, has a great intellect, thinks symbolic … will be fascinated by the night sky … and the phases of the moon. The most obvious and most fantastic conclusion, is that they saw no moon. (Something the rulers of this planet know ... but they count on conspiracy thinkers to break the ice.)

 

Archaeologists are desperately looking for the moon in prehistoric art. So desperate that they assume that the moon must have been a bull, while certain constellations then again were other animals.

 

But if the prehistoric genius has invented a variant of the zodiac, why didn’t that genius painted a crescent moon? Not once, but tens of thousands of times?

 

5000 years after the mega catastrophes suddenly the moon is there. And in roughly 5000 more years she’s a worldwide symbol. But for more than 20,000 years before the mega disasters, an endless time frame -so to speak- a time where painters painted animals like animals, stars as stars, the sun as the sun, a time they made countless depictions of people (women), they never painted the moon as the moon. We must ask ourselves -despite the taboo- how is that possible?

 

We know we keep on going. But that’s because we are astonished. Therefore the characters of the following question should be actually sky-high.

 

Where is the moon in drawings before the mega disasters? (Answer: She was too far away to be seen.)

 

 

The moon was used to cause the Flood

 

 

The deluge, the disappearance of Atlantis, Göbekli Tepe, the Clovis culture ... Does the moon lies at the base of the mega disasters? Did our creators realized that their original good soul was degenerated? That on planet Earth everything is infected with ‘evil’ because evil is an evolutionary necessity for all living beings on planet Earth ... and in fact is nothing more than egocentrism.

 

Was the destruction of themselves and their creatures part of a sophisticated plan?

 

We’re not going to explain our moral thoughts on good and evil. And we hope you will excuse us for repeating ourselves in our site: We love animals but they have no soul. They have only the germs of a soul that on planet Earth never could have developed. Animals are not evil -in the moral sense- because they don’t know the difference between good and evil. Humans do, because humans are partly animal and partly higher being (although the proportions vary from person to person). That higher being is like a built in quantum computer in our DNA that replicates itself with humans.

 

Did they put the moon in orbit around Earth to wipe out a mistake and give a chance to a new start? Did the gods destroyed themselves and sinful humanity -their mutant creatures- because they saw that all went wrong? Did they experimented too much with life on Earth?

 

We don't want to get non-believers a heart attack but even the revival of some dinosaurs could have been on their agenda, just like they are on the (forbidden) agenda of our geniuses today. Ancient texts and pictures demonstrate that people once walked with dinosaurs. And we think that really could have been the case more than 12.600 years ago. Although it seems impossible to reshape T Rex , some scientists think it could be done, and since there are so many things that first seemed impossible ...

 

Besides: Spoken about non-believers, we respect their meaning, but some of them have really hurt us on some internet forums. We have a pretty good skin -maybe a bit out of fashion- but we have our limits. So we hope some of our opponents are for some reason or another not capable to respect the meaning of others. No offence, but we had to say it.

 

Did they realized the offspring of a mutant (depicted as the Venus figurines) born in the south of France had spread to much? Did they selected people to survive somewhat everywhere on earth? Were there Noahs in multiple places? Were there gods in multiple places? To us the answer each time is yes. Plato seemed to be convinced, Bulwer-Lytton gives a lead, and the oldest myths leave little doubt. They may be myths but those of the most ancient cultures show remarkable resemblances. Because of that we conclude that the gods have selected some people to survive the Flood in several places on earth. The gods also seem to have had different shapes and forms depending on their location, but so it goes if you experiment a little bit too much.

 

Fact is there is a giant gap between the mega catastrophes and the first civilizations (like Sumerians). Is that gap caused by the crossbreeding between selected survivors and others (which were not selected but survived against all odds)?

 

We think so.

***

HUMANS DON'T FIT ON EARTH. A lot of people must realize this. Human consciousness -the human soul- is far too evolved. We accept that 'consciousness' and 'soul' are not exactly the same. Animals too have a sort of consciousness. They are aware of certain things. You can discuss about it but we see the human soul as incomparable. To say the least.

 

Where else can human consciousness come from if it was not implanted in a human creature by the gods? Only ... something went wrong ... not only we (crossbred species) make mistakes ... the gods made them too .... they underestimated the conditions of life on Earth. At some point they must have realised a tabula rasa was the best solution. So a new species in time would evolve and find the vital information the gods left behind. The new species would discover that the moon is not the natural satellite of Earth, but rather the ultimate spaceship, caravan, lifeboat ... and the best vault ever made ... all intended to guard them. The gods left us messages on earth but the moon was their superior locker. Nothing would destroy their message and humans who would reach the moon would be clever enough to understand.

 

 

The real rulers know the truth

 

 

The very small number of real rulers know the message. Therefore we think they are much more humble than most of us will accept. But what can they do? Telling the truth would mean chaos. There has to be a group of leaders with superior (extra terrestrial) knowledge and power. If not, our world would soon be overwhelmed by evil. Those who think that it can't get worse than it is today, have to think again. Those who think the world is too bad to bring a -good- child into are wrong. Slowly but surely the world becomes a better place. The impression some have that now it is worse than ever is because we are aware of what takes place through the media. Intolerance and cruelties are still abundant. But in the past it was far worse.

***

After death immortal souls unite. They become part of an unimaginable plasma life form (UFO). (But that’s an item of another chapter).

 

Some know the fundamental truth, but they hide her behind a provocative symbolism. Read the book 'The Secret Architecture of Our Nation's Capital', ponder the Georgia guidestones, see the mysterious bound with Bulwer-Lytton and his Vril-ya (who curiously lived just like the guidestones orders). Why did the moonlandings stopped? Novus ordo seclorum (the other side of the seal) ... the freemasons ... (Bulwer-Lytton, the author of 'The Coming Race' and an icon of the nazi's and their extra ordinary knowledge, was a Rosicrucian. R.C. Cristian, initiator of the guidestones, apparently Christian Rosenkreutz, was the founder of the Rosicrucian order, George Washington ... just until, of all people, Buzz Aldrin ...). The signals one day will be so abundant that even the greatest sceptics will accept the truth.

 

But at the moment 'they' are still hiding the so-called smoking gun. 'Tell the truth sideways because she can be devastating.’ However, there are truths which one better denies. Nonchalantly, to allow some doubt anyway, so the shock that must come sooner or later, will be less devastating.

 

 

The gods were feminine

 

 

It is plausible that a creature far more evolved than a human always is a female. (At that point we probably would call it genderless.)

 

So this subtitle is a little bit misleading because the gods that -we think- came from Scholz's system were genderless. Although we believe that our alien visitors had no problem to genetic engineer a male, we believe they preferred women. Maybe because women looked a little bit more like them. Less aggressive, less power-minded, less sexual behavior, more careful, more caring ... and maybe to some extent easier to genetically manipulate.

 

Men, please don’t panic but it’s written in the stars. Future will make us superfluous, because the Y chromosome is disappearing.

 

Did Isis -Isis as a collective name for all mother/moon goddesses- sacrificed herself for 'sinful mankind' hoping that consciousness would survive and grow (arise), but then again in a form which this time did match conditions on planet Earth? By means of the mega catastrophes nature (partially) has been taken over control of the gods. Men came out of the shadows some 6000 years ago, about the time of Genesis.

 

Genesis 1:27 God created mankind in his own image ... male and female he created ... go and multiply .... and rule over the animals ...

 

Above we used the word partially because women still have more compassion and are less egocentric than men. This compassion or even altruism has nothing to do with mother Earth but has everything to do with mother goddesses'. Time to realize that women in general still possess -a (little) bit more than men- a trait (compassion) that doesn't come from planet Earth.

 

 

 

1250 BC: Isis gives the ankh cross -symbol for resurrection of consciousness- to Nefertari (photo: Wikipedia).

 

 

Things screaming for an answer

 

 

Years ago we wouldn't have believed a word from this interview. More, we even never read it because we thought it was obvious a sort of lunatic who wrote it. Now we think the article could be true. And even if it is a hoax, it could be a manner accepted by the real rulers (and their media) to make the unthinkable thinkable.

 

Numerous things about our moon are screaming to be solved. That is not a coincidence! Sure that the real rulers have found the answers.

 

 

Did the gods knew that humans 'one day' will have to look for another home planet?

 

Earth is plan A for humanity (with many thanks to the technology of the gods that must curb the dangers Earth is facing). But you never know.

 

So Mars is plan B (they say). Our moon is off-limits because she seems to be private property. But what if within twenty years -it can also be tomorrow- following sentence hits the front page: ‘NASA has discovered a giant planet in our solar system that with a little adjustment of greenhouse gases can be made habitable’? (Waiting for another passing Scholz's star system is something for the long term ... very long term.)

 

Many of us don't want to know the real rulers of this planet are making survival plans on another planet while we are watching our favorite numb making tv programs over and over again. (No offence because it's all in all not such a bad thing to do.)

 

One thing is for sure: if humans have to decide to live on another planet (Mars, Planet X or Y or whatever you want to call that planet), then the moon has to play a major role. If not as a spaceship, caravan or lifeboat, then surely as a launch platform.

 

High technological power placed on the guardian of planet Earth can protect us.

 

We believe the so-called tower and other technology on the moon:

- acts like a kind of HAARP, probably also a technology from the gods, that -so they say- can influence minds. Hence the consciousness problems of astronauts on the moon? Hence the consciousness experiments? Or do we really have to believe that only Mitchell did those experiments? He has a lot to lose, even after his death, so he knows when to stop talking. (But still he's a hero to us.) Hence the possibility that UFO's can influence our minds? (Let's face it: astronauts on the moon behaved very strange afterwards.)

- can create plasma balls;

- brought the moon where she is now (with electromagnetism and anti-gravity);

- can guide or destroy incoming comets (a laser works pretty good in a vacuum);

- can influence temperature (because chemtrails are not the only way to do so);

- and yes, we believe that in the future it will even control earthquakes and volcanoes (in particular by controlled lava release);

- ...

 

 

Did the gods had superior spacecraft or did they used wormholes?

 

 

No substantial matter, maybe not even one atom, will ever travel through wormholes. And forget the speed of light. Unless we are able to separate soul from body, we will never reach even a substantial part of it. But maybe the gods could separate mind from body. Anyway to do real jobs you need a body. So the gods must have needed a body too or they could have had the power to take over a body ...

They had superior rockets but not thát superior, compared to the hidden technology of our geniuses. Our geniuses who will build further and always will try to do better than their opponent. A feature of humankind based on earth's life conditions: 'Be better than your opponent'. A pressure of competition our alien ancestors had lost during the uncountable years of their evolution. But who knows how far they are evolved in the mean time?

 

 

WE are the aliens on Earth.

 

 

So much things point to this conclusion. We are their creatures ... and they keep an eye on us with their bundled consciousness (UFO's).

 

Remember what our sixth man on the moon once said: aliens are watching us. They prevented for example a nuclear war in the past. And believe us: not only Mitchel -we speak about high ranking believable people- said those things.

 

 

The Milankovitch curve

 

 

Some say: 'Global climate change, approximately 12.000 to 10.000 years ago, was so specific that it must have been caused by a global kind of earthquake.' (According to Plato Atlantis disappeared 12.600 years ago.)

 

The Milankovitch curve is a guide for coming and going of ice ages on the scale of hundreds of thousands of years. She takes into consideration the small differences in the slope of the earth's axis and the track that Earth follows around the sun. But the curve seems to lose all significance around 10.000 BC. Simply said: the ice age never should have ended according to the curve. So why it ended anyway? Some scientists thought that the ice at the poles became too heavy. ‘At some point it began to slide because of the centrifugal force of the earth's rotation.'

 

Study Charles Hapgood. In the 1960s Hapgood thought that approximately 12.000 years ago the icecaps suddenly shifted. He was a respected researcher who frequented the highest reunions of scholars, but was (we believe wrongly) ultimately ranked as a pseudoscientist (a magic word).

 

Hapgood was ignored. ‘The centrifugal force is too weak to move the icecaps.’

 

The scientific elite keeps looking for an explanation for the abnormal end of the ice age. Now they say it was caused by a disturbance of earth’s magnetic field. ‘Massive solar flares could penetrate through the atmosphere.’ A phenomenon that -weird or not- may have been caused by the sudden appearance of our moon.

 

The reason for the sudden end of the ice age seems to be an enormous conundrum. Meanwhile scientists (those not belonging to the real rulers) are desperate to find an explanation. But we would not be surprised if some of them are looking at the moon (knowing that silence is golden).

 

We believe that the replacement of the moon ended the ice age. And frankly said, those who can move a planet, will have little trouble to manipulate the earth's axis. But did they changed the axis? Who knows?

 

Even a small rotation shock caused by the moon could have had devastating consequences. It would have nailed the ancients. And one must agree that according to Plato the stars changed place. Further myths tell us that one side of the world the sun stood still, while on the other side the night didn’t pass.

 

 

Hans Hörbiger

 

 

And then there is Hans Hörbiger (1860-1931) who told us about the world ice theory . 'The basic substance of all cosmic processes is ice. The moon is an ice cube that constantly falls on planet Earth and erases life. Then our planet takes a new moon out of its orbit around the sun and everything starts all over again.'

 

His theory came to him in a dream.

 

Little chance that serious scientists would give him any credit.

 

But what happened? The theory was believed by prominent nazi scholars of the 1930s and 40s. 'The world ice theory is realistic. The cause of the flood and the disappearance of Atlantis was due to the fact that 12.600 years ago the moon collided with Earth.'

 

Why great scholars gave any credit to Hörbiger? Officially it is considered that they would counter Einsteins' work. Einstein was a Jew, and everyone knows how Nazis thought about Jews.

 

However, there are sufficient elements that prove that they knew that Hörbigers' theory was flawed. But that the moon had fallen from the sky 12.600 years ago, thát they were sure off.

 

Why their conviction seemed to grow with the number of expeditions they made? Not because of Einstein and the Jews. And why didn’t they blame landslides, volcanic eruptions or comets for the Great Flood?

 

Or did their expeditions made them wiser? And did they misinterpreted their discoveries somewhat? Did they thought it was a clash, and not an voluntarily executed manoeuvre, possibly a controlled graze?

 

 

 

Spaceship Moon solves it all

 

 

-how the moon came in an orbit around Earth;

-the abnormal almost circular orbit that she follows;

-the sophisticated distance to Earth;

-magnetism that apparently exists on the moon;

-why so few moon rocks are recovered;

-the two faces of the moon;

-why she’s facing Earth with her most beautiful side: more attractive to visit;

-On top of that: the tidally locked situation gives our leaders a golden opportunity to hide themselves from us. Not visible, no radio signals ... In other words: A perfect place to fulfil top secret work on the far site of the moon. (We think there are, and have been, secret missions to the moon, among other secret things paid with the trillions of dollars that are missing in the budget of the USA);

-why Earth has a moon (as big as a planet) and the other stone-like planets have to do without; (Phobos and Deimos, the moons of Mars, we neglect. They don’t deserve the name ‘moon’ in this context. In addition, everyone can see that they appear merely asteroids. Very special asteroids if you ask us);

 

 

Phobos, average diameter 22.2 km. On Phobos there’s a 'monolith ', subject of various interpretations (photo: Mars Global Surveyor 1998 - comment follows) (Source: Wikipedia)

 

-why we waited so long for the first drawings of the moon;

-the mega disasters and the sudden end of the last ice age;

-the winged, extinguished sun (see below);

 

-... the real reason why manned moonlanding suddenly stopped;

 

-

... our suspicion that NASA on the moon, in addition to underground bases with superior technology, also found anti-gravity technology;

 

-... why humankind has a dream 'lifeboat' at her disposal;

 

-...

 

-... the reluctant attitude of scientists to counter the flaws in the official explanation about the origin of the moon;

 

It gives us even a reason why James Irwin (Apollo 15) seemed to connect the moon with the great flood. For why on earth after his moon landing he was so obsessed with Noah's Ark? (And why did Mitchell had to refer to Noah with the name of his institute?)

***

Irwin came in contact with the controversial American amateur archaeologist Ron Wyatt. With metal detectors they explored the place where according to the Bible the Ark stranded. Wyatt made a number of convincing discoveries ... which were debunked afterwards. However, he keeps insisting that he has found the Ark indeed.

 

Bizarre that Irwin became involved with such research. He was a committed Christian, but also a real scientist and a realist. Did he realized that the Ark once existed? If Irwin knew the secrets of the moon, he'll probably realized that the stories about the flood and the Ark contain more than one ground of truth.

 

 

A hollowed out asteroid as a space station?

 

 

Mars has two moons that don’t deserve the name ‘moon’. They look like two large boulders. But there is something very strange with phobos (one of the so called moons). (Look at the youtube fragment below.)

 

Many believe that phobos -just like our own moon- is placed there by extraterrestrials. Some think it was a space station. And it must been said, the ‘monolith’ on phobos seems to be constructed by ‘the hands of the gods’. It’s a monolith of which there are no detailed pictures -strange-.

 

'Phobos is a hollowed out asteroid and a space station.’ That sounds familiar. For believe it or not, Americans are keen to find out how to make a space station from a hollowed out asteroid.

 

Again: History is self-repeating.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Black Knight

 

The Black Night is a so called satellite that follows a polar orbit. His existence is being disputed for a long time by the authorities (and others).

 

However, we think the Black Night can be one of more satellites that belonged to our creators.

 

The Black Night on Wikipedia.

The Black Night on Youtube.

 

We won’t go deep into the subject because we must keep our eye on the big picture. Just some reservations:

 

- first of all the name of the satellite: as if he was doomed to end in a commercial spot of the Pepsi company. So he could be made ridiculous. Just don’t let mislead you.

- why authorities who have all the means to prove the nature of the black knight are not giving us a credible explanation?

- some claim that Tesla was the first who discovered the satellite. And although Tesla believed in extra terrestrial intelligent beings, the discovery of the satellite by him has ended in a yes/no game ...

- in the 50’s several sources mention the satellite (see link to the first page of the site below).

- the satellite would orbit first one of the poles and by its return it would orbit the other pole. Strange because in the 50’s no human satellite seemed to be able doing that. (Today they can do it anyway.)

- it must been said authorities were once proud to announce that the black knight was a piece of the Discoverer rocket. (Something that simply not could have been the case – see also the link that follows.)

 

A link to one of the best conspiracy websites in the world .

 

 

 

***

We won’t keep on arguing because we can’t prove anything. Of course not. Because it's about a believe in the big picture and the acceptance of the idea that all the indications about our extra terrestrial origins are called into question by a sophisticated machinery. And please don’t tell us that this is not possible.

 

 

Translated from Eva Was Eerst: april 2012

Next