EVA WAS EERST Chauvet - cave paintings - Cro Magnon

 

 

 

An impossible jump

 

 

A superior artist, as from one day to the next, gave us evidence that human consciousness came out of nothing. As if 500 million years, where laws of evolution ruled every step, suddenly were of no value anymore.

 

The name of the artist? Cro Magnon. A name that refers to a Dordogne cave, located in the southwest of France. In Lascaux (Dordogne) in 1940 a 18 year old boy discovered paintings that were 15.000 years old ... those paintings were breathtaking. And because between 15.000 and 30.000 years ago archeologists found pictures that were of a far less quality, they concluded that there must have been a gradual learning process. All in all a logical but too fast conclusion. Because in 1994 speleologists discovered the Chauvet cave (Ardèche) –also south of France-. The paintings were 32.000 years old and they were far more beautiful than those in Lascaux. Almost unbelievable is that nobody ever seemed to have exercised to become such a skilled artist.

 

We don’t believe that the use of rocks and sticks by the artist's predecessor, so-called art older than Chauvet, was the result of some significant intelligence. It could never be compared to the indescribable superiority of the Chauvet artist. Besides, the 'tools' of the predecessors are manufactured and used today in a similar way by certain species of apes. Even with a great deal of goodwill we cannot believe that some scratches and pits in rocks -long before Chauvet- are conscious art. Some of this 'art' is no more than what we see in it now. A pure subjective interpretation. Some are made by nature. Others are made accidentally or are the result of an inherited skill belonging to some animal. So some scratches and pits may be the work of what one might call 'a smart monkey', but nothing more than that. The inherited skills served no other purpose than 'just making it possible to the species to survive'.

 

Perhaps Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals could even have done better than a smart monkey today. Given their limited physical abilities they must have had more brain power to survive in nature.

 

The brain competence of the Chauvet artist however is sky high, as if there must have been a big bang in consciousness 32.000 years ago.

 

All paintings were discovered very deep in the caves. There's no sign of aggression or sex, and no sign of a male figure. Archeologists found thousands of so-called figurines. All are pictures of women, maybe even pictures of the same woman. The oldest figurines are approximately as old as the paintings in Chauvet. Remarkable that after the disappearance of Gobekli Tepe, a site probably perished by the Flood some 12.600 years ago there is a gab of thousands of years without a sign of art at all. Suddenly, about 6000 years after the Flood they seem to have restarted to make art. And the old figurines appeared again.

 

Weird as well: to our best knowledge the first male figures date from some 6000 years ago. And immediately you see the depiction of power and aggression.

 

You must realize we completely ignore the ridiculous male figure in the Lascaux cave. Incredible to us that scientists see this picture as proof that a male figure was carved on the rock face some 32.000 years ago. Only one drawing? That alone should raise questions. Plus the drawing seems to be made by a pathetic, untalented person. Though scientists conclude that there were pictures of males 32.000 years ago. To us, that male figure is a hoax or a scratch from a visitor who lived 20 or more thousands of years after the miraculous Chauvet artist.

 

Was the artist a woman?

 

Nothing that points to power, aggression or sex, really, that looks more like a woman than a man.

 

And why so deep underground?

 

Why all art seems to diminish in quality after Chauvet?

 

Walk with all art, all over the world on a time scale back in time and you will find yourself in Chauvet, the place where for so many people the most beautiful art ever, is made.

 

We don’t have proof but when we puzzled it out (hopefully we were not pushing too hard on the pieces), it seems that 32.000 years ago the mother of all mothers was born. Not Isis, because she was a goddess, but a kind of Eve, maybe a mutant made by the gods.

 

Note that we believe that there were multiple gods (in fact 'goddesses') at the same time in several regions in the world. Just like there were multiple mutants. But it looks like the offspring of the mutant that arose in the south of France had something special. They would later conquer the world.

 

Eve came first.

 

Sorry boys, this is no porn site, if that was the case, our site would have a lot more visitors. Porn is meant for the beast in every man, and to a lesser extent, in every woman. And we agree, sometimes we have to feed that beast. But please don't overfeed.

 

We think the gods and the descendants of the 'mutants' seem to have lived a separate life until crossbreeding became inevitable. Crossbreeding namely is a very important tool life on earth uses to diversify and therefore to survive. The Coming Race of Bulwer-Lytton has shown us a glimpse of the truth. Not that we counted on Bulwer-Lytton to write our site. We had so many indications that human evolution was not a normal one. Long ago we must have had strange visitors ...

 

next