EVA WAS EERST Chauvet - cave paintings - Cro Magnon




We know that every method to date a rock or a cave painting has a margin of error (sometimes a big margin) but a difference of a few thousands of years does not change our point. We are convinced about the fact that mankind had a 'big bang' in consciousness. That 'big bang' should have left a trial of millions of years of evolution. And that is simply not the case.



An impossible jump



A superior artist, as from one day to the next, gave us evidence that human consciousness came out of nothing. As if 500 million years, where laws of evolution ruled every step, suddenly were of no value anymore.


The name of the artist? Cro Magnon. A name that refers to a Dordogne cave, located in the southwest of France. In Lascaux (Dordogne) in 1940 a 18 year old boy discovered paintings that were 15.000 years old ... those paintings were breathtaking. And because between 15.000 and 30.000 years ago archeologists found pictures that were of a far less quality, they concluded that there must have been a gradual learning process. All in all a logical but too fast conclusion. Because in 1994 speleologists discovered the Chauvet cave (Ardèche) –also south of France-. The paintings were 32.000 years old and they were far more beautiful than those in Lascaux. Almost unbelievable is that nobody ever seemed to have exercised to become such a skilled artist.


A study concluded that capuchins can think symbolic. And probably Homo sapiens and Neanderthaler were much better in symbolic thinking. We don’t exclude Neanderthals pictured for example some geometric figures. Maybe they highlighted existing cracks in rocks to show some animals or so. But if such indications will be found in the future, they will be insufficient to explain the explosion of the unbelievable artwork found in Chauvet. To be able to explain the work in Chauvet geologists would have found extremely high quantities of amateurish work of art, created before Chauvet. Anyway its logical that prehistoric people, let's say 50.000 years ago, had more intelligence and creativity than (other) animals. Without that they would never have been able to survive the struggle of life on planet Earth, given their physical limitations.


The brain competence of the Chauvet artist however is sky high, as if there must have been a big bang in consciousness 32.000 years ago.


All paintings were discovered very deep in the caves. There's no sign of aggression or sex, and no sign of a male figure. Archeologists found thousands of so-called figurines. All are pictures of women, maybe even pictures of the same woman. The oldest figurines are approximately as old as the paintings in Chauvet. Remarkable that after the disappearance of Gobekli Tepe, a site probably perished by the Flood some 12.600 years ago there is a gab of thousands of years without a sign of art at all. Suddenly, about 6000 years after the Flood they seem to have restarted to make art. And the old figurines appeared again.


Weird as well: to our best knowledge the first male figures date from some 6000 years ago. And immediately you see the depiction of power and aggression.


You must realize we completely ignore the ridiculous male figure in the Lascaux cave. Incredible to us that scientists see this picture as proof that a male figure was carved on the rock face some 32.000 years ago. Only one drawing? That alone should raise questions. Plus the drawing seems to be made by a pathetic, untalented person. Though scientists conclude that there were pictures of males 32.000 years ago. To us, that male figure is a hoax or a scratch from a visitor who lived 20 or more thousands of years after the miraculous Chauvet artist.


Anyway -excluded half a miracle- whatever one will find in the future that looks like prehistoric art worthy of the name, we think it will be the work of degenerate gods.


... Or of specialist forgers. We even don't exclude that some findings or results will be manipulated in some way or another. But in the meantime too much scientists must realize that Chauvet is inexplicable in a natural way. And that every effort to explain will be too little too late.


Was the artist a woman?


Nothing that points to power, aggression or sex, really, that looks more like a woman than a man.


And why so deep underground?


Why all art seems to diminish in quality after Chauvet?


Walk with all art, all over the world on a time scale back in time and you will find yourself in Chauvet, the place where for so many people the most beautiful art ever, is made.


We don’t have proof but when we puzzled it out (hopefully we were not pushing too hard on the pieces), it seems that 32.000 years ago the mother of all mothers was born. Not Isis, because she was a goddess, but a kind of Eve, maybe a mutant made by the gods.


Note that we believe that there were multiple gods (in fact 'goddesses') at the same time in several regions in the world. Just like there were multiple mutants ... we believe artificial mutants ... because they were the result of genetic engineering ... by the (degenerating) gods. So there must be other paintings like those in the Chauvet cave -maybe on the other site of the world- waiting to be discovered. And who knows, maybe those paintings will reveal more than we can think about. Although, we are convinced about one fact: those paintings will not have a credible kind of evolution. In other words: we believe the oldest paintings will be the most sophisticated. Keep in mind that we believe that the offspring of the mutant that arose in the south of France had something special (or they were the most fortunate), because they later would conquer the world.


Update: December 2020: To be honest, we usually leave our site for what it is. After all, we still support what we wrote 10 years ago, although of course not everything will be correct. Yet the cave paintings continue to show that there has been no gradual evolution in art - in symbolic thinking, you can safely call it 'Consciousness'-. For example, cave paintings of roughly 40,000 years old were discovered in Indonesia in 2020. And what do the specialists in question suggest? We quote: 'There was no gradual evolution of Paleolithic art from simple to complex around 35,000 years ago, at least not in Southeast Asia'.



Eve came first


Sorry boys, this is no porn site, if that was the case, our site would have a lot more visitors. Porn is meant for the beast in every man, and to a lesser extent, in every woman. And we agree, sometimes we have to feed that beast. But please don't overfeed.


We think the gods and the descendants of the 'mutants' seem to have lived a separate life until crossbreeding became inevitable. Crossbreeding namely is a very important tool life on earth uses to diversify and therefore to survive. The Coming Race of Bulwer-Lytton has shown us a glimpse of the truth. Not that we counted on Bulwer-Lytton to write our site. We had so many indications that human evolution was not a normal one. Long ago we must have had strange visitors ...