Why Apollo landings stopped?
- Safety issues?
With all due respect: only a few people died. Thousands
are dying in car and other accidents, by murder, war, dangerous
prestige projects ... it seems our leaders
are not so worried about those deaths ...
Before Apollo 11
there were 65 missions to the moon accomplished. So
technical means were not that bad at all. Safety issues could not have been the reason.
- Health concerns for astronauts?
Don’t think so. Men who reached the moon mostly are in great condition
after more than 40 years. We could
give many examples ten times less important than a moonbase
where human lifes seem to be very cheap.
- Was money shortage the reason?
No. Governments, banks and private investors worldwide have
thrown masses of money out of the windows and that during forty years.
They dumped their money in every thinkable project but for the
moon landings there was nothing left? Come on.
Don’t believe that a moon landing costs -let's say-
a hundred of billions of dollars. That is simply a lie. Why else
private investigators now planning moon trips for a fraction
of what NASA has made us believe a moon landing costs? Richard Bransom, Elon Musk
etcetera ... if they would have been allowed to go their own way by the real rulers they already would
have walked on the moon.
They are great men but ho so tiny bunnies compared to the real powerful
men. Bransom and others have plans to explore space, make tourist
tours in space, build hotels, and yes they plan to visit the moon.
But be sure they will encounter lots of 'misfortune' on their way.
Besides: visiting the moon? It would be under extreme supervision of the real rulers.
And we are not sure if Bransom with his rebellious image will accept that.
Visiting the moon will not happen with him in pole position, if you ask us.
Private missions –if they ever will be allowed- will be followed
very closely by the real rulers.
By the way: Strange that NASA's budget has hit rock bottom
after the moon landings. We think we know why.
Robert Shapiro (University of New York) once
said (we paraphrase) that a moonbase would be a gift to humanity.
Money is in this context just accessory.
The moon is the best place for scanning space
and detecting dangerous comets.
But as a bonus, a
moonbase offers an extra survival chance for humans, if a worldwide disaster,
in spite of all precautions of the gods, hits earth.
- Was a lack of popularity the reason?
Lack of popularity was almost ten years after the space flight of
Tereshkova one of the reasons for the termination of the Apollo project.
People no longer took for granted they had spent too much tax money. Why the real
rulers did no real
effort to stir up interest of the people? Only God knows. One woman
(poor thing) on the moon would have boosted popularity in a way never
seen before. But, incredible but true, NASA left astronauts dancing, singing,
playing golf ... and make embarrassing movements on the moon, like as they were clowns
-a odd group of 12 apostles if you ask us-.
Clowns only stupid tax payers could laugh with. The average citizen
didn’t laugh. It was their money they were playing with.
Why NASA
did let those things happen?
Actually, it appears popularity had to go DOWN instead of up ... The lower
the popularity, the easier one could end the Apollo project. So moon landings and
moonbase could wait indefinetely.
Later NASA dispatched golden messages in space. Again wasted tax money …
Why NASA has send LP records and a signpost to earth into space?
If aliens would find
it, they could come to visit ... and destroy us. Why NASA took that risk?
If our creators came out of
the neighborhood of (a star like) Scholz's star (see another chapter), it is not impossible that
they 'fertilized' (maybe you rather like 'poisoned') another earthlike planet. So an extra terrestrial race could exist
maybe even in our solar system. Famous men warned us about a
war with an extra terrestrial race. But those men seemed to
have been obsessed by UFO's (and UFO's are a special case).
Something a little out of the context but we must say it
Why one of the greatest Americans (Neil Armstrong) is
buried at sea? Because he wanted that? And why he wanted
that? He was a humble man. But not so humble as they made
us believe. He fought in the Korean war and was very pleased
with all the decorations he got. Armstrong
carried a great secret upon his shoulders and he was persuaded
not to tell his secret
to the world. He was a tormented man. What he really knew about
the moon will never reach us.
Who shall say why he really wanted to be
buried at sea? Maybe he decided that he didn't deserve
the honor they would give him after death, so
his grave could not become a place of pilgrimage, because it would
be the summit of hypocrisy after a period of more than forty years
he carried the greatest lie in human history in his heart.
Although we think he did the right thing. NASA's moon landings brought something
to light that some people -those who can handle it- deserve to know
but that would turn the world upside down. The truth would create a hunt for
extraterrestrial knowledge, a hunt for more power, she would take the foothold (religion)
away from millions of people. The power of the church would collapse just
like those of so many powerful men. Maybe, just maybe,
a struggle between women and men would
emerge ...
What benefit the truth would bring for humankind? Maybe its better
to go step by step and let the truth find it's way over a few hundreds of years.
Besides: the twelve men NASA putted on the moon have said
things we are not going to repeat but which should open our eyes.
Astronauts are screened by all means … they swore precious
oaths of secrecy to NASA, especially about everything they could encounter on the moon.
But some of them behaved
very strange after the moon landings. As if they had realised
where the real origin of mankind lies.
Something that also bothers us: Why they are now preparing a marsbase? Where is
the so long expected and necessary moonbase? Note that
every important man forty years ago stressed that there
would be a moonbase in a few years after the first moon landing.
A moonbase that would serve many objectives but first of all
had to be used as a launch platform to visit Mars.
Only don’t hope for a disclosure from NASA. That would be naïve.
NASA wants us to discuss about the moon or Mars and the pictures they
are publishing. A yes/no discussion is something that fits in their strategy to keep us busy.
Yes we think our real rulers know about
structures on the moon and maybe on Mars or even another planet in our solar system. They know
it, because they have their knowledge from our creators. Our creators would have been stupid
not to have left our leaders everything they need to know. And that everything was (or still is) on the moon.
We believe inter alia there are secret moonbases ... our leaders will use (among other things) to protect some of us
from -for example- incoming comets.
The prestige hoax
It's incredible that many of us still believe that the space race had
everything to do with prestige. And it's remarkable that one now
says that
with the first man on the moon the race was over, while all prior
statements revealed the moonbase was the goal. It was the absolutely
necessary step for all further developments.
One of the many examples that prove the determination: June 1969:
Prototypes of the NERVA Motors run at full speed. Cheering on all
seats. The purpose of the incredibly powerful nuclear rocket
engines was clear: 'First the moon, and within 15 years
we visit Mars.' September 1969: A study group around president
Nixon confirms the plans for a trip to Mars. Doubt is nowhere to be found.
The moonbase would be the perfect launch platform.
Until suddenly NASA's turned a blind eye to the moon. ‘We never have
taken a moonbase and a journey to Mars seriously.' Now that
we have won the race, we can better use our money for something else.'
If that was not a lie, we will still eat our shoe ...
Everyone, of course, may have his own thoughts, but we are convinced that
stopping manned moon landings had nothing to do with
money, prestige, safety ... Vasily Mishin, who
in 1966 after the death of his mentor Korolev had taken over leadership
of the Soviet missions: 'I don't understand it, we were so close!' If he was
speaking the truth, he was certainly no real leader of this world.
The reason
for the Soviets to stop: 'We have not won the race. We can use our
money for other things.'
One shoe is enough.
Our conviction:
The moon landings were stopped
because the mother of all conspiracy is right: We are genetically engineered ape-like creatures.
Alien technology has to stay in the hands of the real
rulers. Without them the world would be much worse than it is now.
The discovery made them more humble than you think.
A disclosure would mean complete chaos on earth.
What if the moon is what we think she is?
Then she a Jack of all trades, a Deus ex machina, a super solution,
part of a plan maybe not so simple for
our creators to execute but ho so efficient.
Then she's used to change life on earth, she could be used
as a launch pad for rockets to divert incoming comets,
a launch pad for spacecraft to go to other planets, a resting place for astronauts
who travel to a space station and need to gain some strength,
bone strength, because an astronaut in space loses more than one percent bone density in a month
(that alone to us was/is a reason to build a moonbase),
a place where our creators left signs of their existence,
where they left us technology, knowledge ... a place where
human consciousness could survive if on earth takes place
a catastrophe that could wipe out humanity ... (maybe you can finish the list).
Water and life
There’s a lot of water (in the form of ice) on the moon (regolith also is containing
the elements to make water but that again is another story).
No doubt about that ice for forty years.
And where there is ice there could be life. Finding a primitive life
form on the moon would make the cost of a manned moon trip a negligible factor.
Armstrong a sad hero
Anyone committed with the subject knows the rumors that especially Armstrong
was overthrown with what he saw on the moon.
Communication with the outside
world became interrupted. Nonetheless, some specialized radio amateurs
have
taken care of the conversations. According to those intercepted messages
-later also according to confidential statements of initiates-
Armstrong on the moon, has seen a strange light.
And as if that wasn't enough:
Near the landing module there were space ships that clearly were from
an alien civilization.
All in all not so crazy, because if alien visitors ever
landed on the moon or later, on earth, they surely came not by foot.
And they must have left a few space ships on the moon (on earth too,
but we were not allowed to see them and if the Roswell story is true
than chances are real one of them crashed during a salvage operation).
Witnesses?
Many! But without credentials. And guess why they lost credibility?
Maurice Chatelain worked for twenty years at NASA as a communication
expert and had very good contacts. He was involved in the
preparation of the moon landings and stated publicly several times
that he knew first-hand that Armstrong on the moon saw alien space
craft. Because he came to believe in UFOs -one would do for less- and
later wrote books about UFO’s, he was portrayed as a freak. His
reputation shrank to zero.
Cartner, Reagan, Irwin, Mitchell etc etc ... they believed (believe) in aliens. Men
too great to make ridiculous. So real rulers let the media do a subtle job
(we hear and see believers and non believers ... and a lot of doubt).
Reagan died in 2004. He was one of the greatest. But some will attribute him a low IQ,
a henpecked husband etc.
Douglas MacArthur knew a lot, but he was not one of the real rulers.
He talked about a war with extraterrestrials, strange materials,
lengthening life span with a hundred of years, technology that could
influence weather systems … Things that now are coming true.
He didn’t knew everything but if you take his words into
account and you think about what Roscoe Hillenkoetter, Riedel, von Braun,
Oberth, and so many others have said, you possibly will
come to the same conclusion as we do: There are great
rulers here on earth who keep a lot hidden from us ... especially about our origins.
We still have
so much to say while we are sure only a few of you will believe us (a sad thing) ...
But then again, lucky us ... We don't care. We only hope you will
respect our meaning, just like
we will respect yours.
A shocking truth?
If earth -long ago- has received visit from an alien civilization
than there
is evidence of it on the moon.
It looks like scholars are afraid to speak out this statement.
Individuals including Ian Crawford from Birkbeck College (University of
London) had a few tricky questions, but the reply of his colleagues
was nothing more than a deafening silence.
Who has an open mind, cannot ignore the possibility that earth ever had an
alien visit.
It is short-sighted to assume that men will discover alien intelligence
within, say, 5000 years and at the same time reject the possibility that
the earth was visited in the past by that same intelligent life. Moreover,
it would be the most normal thing in the world as those visitors
first landed
on the sterile and safe moon, far away from viruses, bacteria and
any other
obstacles that could threaten them on earth.
However, the moon has practically no atmosphere. So all traces,
even those
of millions of years old, remain untouched (or almost untouched
because there are meteorites and sort of space weather we are
not going to discuss).
Next
Tip: maybe it goes quicker if you click the return key on
your keyboard.